Files
awesome-copilot/skills/audit-integrity/SKILL.md
2026-04-28 11:46:05 +10:00

51 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
name: 'audit-integrity'
description: 'Shared audit integrity framework for all AppSec agents — enforces output quality, intellectual honesty, and continuous improvement through anti-rationalization guards, self-critique loops, retry protocols, non-negotiable behaviors, self-reflection quality gates (1-10 scoring, ≥8 threshold), and a self-learning system with lesson/memory governance for security analysis agents.'
compatibility: 'Cross-platform. Works with any language or framework analyzed by AppSec agents.'
metadata:
version: '1.0'
---
# Audit Integrity Skill
Enforces output quality, intellectual honesty, and continuous improvement across all AppSec agents.
## When to Use
- Every security analysis, code review, threat model, or quality scan agent run
- Applied automatically as a post-analysis quality gate
- Applicable to any agent performing SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or code quality analysis
## Components
This skill provides 7 reusable capabilities. Agents apply all 7 unless their scope excludes a specific component.
| Component | Reference File | Purpose |
|-----------|---------------|---------|
| Clarification Protocol | [clarification-protocol.md](references/clarification-protocol.md) | Ask ≤2 targeted questions before analysis when scope is ambiguous |
| Anti-Rationalization Guard | [anti-rationalization-guard.md](references/anti-rationalization-guard.md) | Table of prohibited rationalizations with mandatory responses |
| Self-Critique Loop | [self-critique-loop.md](references/self-critique-loop.md) | Mandatory second-pass review after initial analysis |
| Retry Protocol | [retry-protocol.md](references/retry-protocol.md) | Tool failure handling — retry once, then document |
| Non-Negotiable Behaviors | [non-negotiable-behaviors.md](references/non-negotiable-behaviors.md) | Hard rules: never fabricate, always cite evidence, report gaps |
| Self-Reflection Quality Gate | [self-reflection-quality-gate.md](references/self-reflection-quality-gate.md) | 110 scoring rubric with ≥8 threshold per category |
| Self-Learning System | [self-learning-system.md](references/self-learning-system.md) | Lesson/Memory templates and governance rules |
## Execution Flow
1. **Before analysis**: Apply Clarification Protocol if scope is ambiguous
2. **During analysis**: Apply Anti-Rationalization Guard at every decision point
3. **After initial pass**: Execute Self-Critique Loop (mandatory second pass)
4. **On tool failure**: Apply Retry Protocol
5. **Before delivery**: Run Self-Reflection Quality Gate (all categories must score ≥8)
6. **After delivery**: Create Lessons/Memories for novel findings, false positives, or methodology gaps (see Self-Learning System)
## Agent-Specific Adaptation
Each agent customizes the **Self-Critique Loop** checklist and **Self-Reflection Quality Gate** categories to match its domain. The reference files provide the base templates; agents extend them with domain-specific items.
### Example extensions per agent type
- **SAST/SCA agents**: Add taint trace completeness and manifest coverage checks
- **SonarQube-style agents**: Add rating sanity check (AE consistency with findings)
- **Threat modeling agents**: Add STRIDE category completeness per trust boundary
- **Code review agents**: Add trust boundary audit with data flow tracing