Update FlowStudio Power Automate skills (#1664)

* feat(flowstudio): align Power Automate skills with MCP server v1.1.6

Foundation skill (flowstudio-power-automate-mcp) rewritten to use the
server's new tool_search and list_skills meta-tools (v1.1.5+) for
discovery instead of cataloging every tool by hand. Cut from 519 to
295 lines. New "Which Skill to Use When" intent-keyed decision tree
points at the four specialized skills.

Build/debug/governance/monitoring updated for use-case framing. Tools
that genuinely cross tiers (e.g. debug skill borrowing
get_store_flow_summary) are correct when the workflow needs them — the
split between skills is by use-case intent, not by tool partition.

Build skill: new Step 3a Resolving Dynamic Connector Values covers
get_live_dynamic_options outer-parameter auto-bridge (v1.1.6+) and the
AadGraph user-picker fallback via shared_office365users.SearchUserV2
(replaces broken builtInOperation:AadGraph.GetUsers).

Debug skill: Outlook user-picker failure note pointing at the fallback.

Monitoring skill description disambiguates from the server's monitor-flow
tool bundle (runtime control of a single flow) — this skill is
tenant-wide health analytics over the cached store.

All 5 skills validate via npm run skill:validate; line endings LF only;
codespell clean; auto-regenerated docs/README.skills.md included.

* fix(flowstudio): remove deprecated tool references

The v1.1.5 MCP server release marked 5 tools [DEPRECATED] but the
previous alignment commit missed them. Replacements per server source:

- get_live_flow_http_schema → read trigger.inputs.schema from get_live_flow
- get_live_flow_trigger_url → read trigger.metadata.callbackUrl from get_live_flow
- get_store_flow_trigger_url → get_store_flow.triggerUrl field
- get_store_flow_errors → get_store_flow_runs(status=["Failed"])
- set_store_flow_state → set_live_flow_state

Touches build, debug, governance, monitoring SKILL.md and the
foundation skill's tool-reference.md. Remaining mentions of the
deprecated names are intentional — they live in deprecation notices
naming the obsolete wrapper alongside its replacement.

* Update FlowStudio Power Automate skills

* Cover latest FlowStudio MCP actions

* Trim FlowStudio Power Automate skills

* Number FlowStudio build workflow steps
This commit is contained in:
Catherine Han
2026-05-11 11:28:29 +10:00
committed by GitHub
parent cf6bbba6fc
commit e67c66c441
17 changed files with 730 additions and 775 deletions
+63 -26
View File
@@ -9,13 +9,6 @@ description: >-
fix a broken Power Automate flow, diagnose a timeout, trace a DynamicOperationRequestFailure,
check connector auth errors, read error details from a run, or troubleshoot
expression failures. Requires a FlowStudio MCP subscription — see https://mcp.flowstudio.app
metadata:
openclaw:
requires:
env:
- FLOWSTUDIO_MCP_TOKEN
primaryEnv: FLOWSTUDIO_MCP_TOKEN
homepage: https://mcp.flowstudio.app
---
# Power Automate Debugging with FlowStudio MCP
@@ -28,18 +21,19 @@ cloud flows through the FlowStudio MCP server.
> [Null value crashes child flow](https://github.com/ninihen1/power-automate-mcp-skills/blob/main/examples/null-child-flow.md)
**Prerequisite**: A FlowStudio MCP server must be reachable with a valid JWT.
See the `power-automate-mcp` skill for connection setup.
See the `flowstudio-power-automate-mcp` skill for connection setup.
Subscribe at https://mcp.flowstudio.app
---
## Source of Truth
> **Always call `tools/list` first** to confirm available tool names and their
> parameter schemas. Tool names and parameters may change between server versions.
> **Always call `list_skills` / `tool_search` first** to confirm available tool
> names and parameter schemas. Tool names and parameters may change between
> server versions.
> This skill covers response shapes, behavioral notes, and diagnostic patterns —
> things `tools/list` cannot tell you. If this document disagrees with `tools/list`
> or a real API response, the API wins.
> things tool schemas cannot tell you. If this document disagrees with
> `tool_search` or a real API response, the API wins.
---
@@ -161,6 +155,8 @@ detail = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs",
runName=RUN_ID,
actionName=root_action)
if len(detail) > 1:
print(f"{root_action} returned {len(detail)} repetitions; inspect iteration indexes")
out = detail[0] if detail else {}
print(f"Action: {out.get('actionName')}")
print(f"Status: {out.get('status')}")
@@ -198,6 +194,39 @@ if out.get("inputs"):
| `InvalidTemplate` | The exact expression that failed and the null/wrong-type value |
| `BadRequest` | The request body that was sent and why the server rejected it |
### Foreach iterations
When `actionName` refers to an action inside a foreach, the output tool can
return every repetition of that action. Each item may include
`repetitionIndexes` with the loop name and zero-based `itemIndex`. Use
`iterationIndex` to inspect one iteration after you find the suspicious item:
```python
all_reps = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs",
environmentName=ENV,
flowName=FLOW_ID,
runName=RUN_ID,
actionName=root_action)
for rep in all_reps[:10]:
print(rep.get("repetitionIndexes"), rep.get("status"), rep.get("error"))
one_rep = mcp("get_live_flow_run_action_outputs",
environmentName=ENV,
flowName=FLOW_ID,
runName=RUN_ID,
actionName=root_action,
iterationIndex=3)
```
### Evidence Compose Bookends
For uncertain connector work, add a `Compose_*_Request` before the risky action
and a `Compose_*_Result` after it, with the result action allowed on both
`Succeeded` and `Failed`. This gives future debugging a clean payload snapshot
without requiring another deploy. Do not include secrets or long binary payloads
in these bookends.
### Example: HTTP action returning 500
```
@@ -259,10 +288,9 @@ for action_name in [root_action, "Compose_WeekEnd", "HTTP_Get_Data"]:
> ⚠️ Output payloads from array-processing actions can be very large.
> Always slice (e.g. `[:500]`) before printing.
> **Tip**: Omit `actionName` to get ALL actions in a single call.
> This returns every action's inputs/outputs — useful when you're not sure
> which upstream action produced the bad data. But use 120s+ timeout as
> the response can be very large.
> **Tip**: Omit `actionName` to list top-level actions when you're not sure
> which action produced the bad data. Once you pick an action inside a foreach,
> pass `iterationIndex` to avoid pulling every repetition into context.
---
@@ -317,9 +345,12 @@ is broken at the PA listEnum layer and always returns
modifies an Outlook action via `update_live_flow` and tries to resolve a user
through dynamic options. **Don't fix it by retrying AadGraph** — switch to
`shared_office365users.SearchUserV2` instead (returns the same AAD user shape).
See the `power-automate-build` skill, **Step 3a — Resolving Dynamic Connector
Values**, for the working pattern. `describe_live_connector` (v1.1.6+) returns
this fallback as a structured `fallback` field on the affected parameter.
Use `describe_live_connector` to confirm whether the affected parameter exposes
a structured `fallback`, then call `get_live_dynamic_options` against
`shared_office365users.SearchUserV2` instead of the broken AadGraph operation.
For dynamic field schemas rather than dropdown options, use
`get_live_dynamic_properties` with the metadata returned by
`describe_live_connector`.
---
@@ -389,11 +420,17 @@ For flows with a `Request` (HTTP) trigger, use `trigger_live_flow` when you
need to send a **different** payload than the original run:
```python
# First inspect what the trigger expects
schema = mcp("get_live_flow_http_schema",
environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
print("Expected body schema:", schema.get("requestSchema"))
print("Response schemas:", schema.get("responseSchemas"))
# First inspect what the trigger expects — read directly from the flow definition
defn = mcp("get_live_flow", environmentName=ENV, flowName=FLOW_ID)
triggers = defn["properties"]["definition"]["triggers"]
manual = next(iter(triggers.values())) # usually the only trigger on HTTP flows
request_schema = manual.get("inputs", {}).get("schema")
print("Expected body schema:", request_schema)
# Response schemas live on Response action(s) in the actions block
for name, act in defn["properties"]["definition"]["actions"].items():
if act.get("type") == "Response":
print(f"Response {name}:", act.get("inputs", {}).get("schema"))
# Trigger with a test payload
result = mcp("trigger_live_flow",
@@ -433,5 +470,5 @@ print(f"Status: {result['responseStatus']}, Body: {result.get('responseBody')}")
## Related Skills
- `power-automate-mcp` — Foundation skill: connection setup, MCP helper, tool discovery
- `power-automate-build` — Build and deploy new flows
- `flowstudio-power-automate-mcp` — Foundation skill: connection setup, MCP helper, tool discovery
- `flowstudio-power-automate-build` — Build and deploy new flows
@@ -149,6 +149,24 @@ iterations in parallel, causing write conflicts or undefined ordering.
---
### Foreach Parent Failed After Handled Inner Failure
**Symptom**: Inner actions have failure handlers, but the parent `Foreach` still
shows `Failed`, and downstream actions such as `Response` are skipped.
**Root cause**: A handled child failure can still mark the loop container as
failed. Downstream `runAfter` that only accepts `Succeeded` will not run.
**Diagnosis**: Inspect the parent foreach with `get_live_flow_run_error`, then
inspect child action outputs for the iteration that failed.
**Fix**: If partial success is acceptable, allow the downstream join/response to
run after `Succeeded` and `Failed`, and include an explicit error summary in the
payload. If the loop must be all-or-nothing, wrap risky inner work in a Scope and
handle success/failure at the Scope boundary.
---
## Update / Deploy Errors
### `update_live_flow` Returns No-Op
@@ -186,3 +204,20 @@ values override new_data for matching records.
Before: @sort(union(outputs('Old_Array'), body('New_Array')), 'Date')
After: @sort(union(body('New_Array'), outputs('Old_Array')), 'Date')
```
---
### Null Cascade in Filter Array / Query
**Symptom**: A lookup/filter step returns the wrong record or a later expression
fails on null even though the filter action itself succeeded.
**Root cause**: The lookup key is null or empty. A condition such as
`equals(item()?['Email'], outputs('Lookup_Email'))` can accidentally match rows
where both sides are null, or can pass an empty array downstream.
**Diagnosis**: Inspect the action that creates the lookup key and the filter
output length. Confirm the key is non-empty before trusting the filter result.
**Fix**: Add a non-empty guard before the filter, normalize comparison values
with `trim()`/`toLower()`, and branch explicitly when no match is found.
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ Flow is failing
│ ├── error.code = "ActionFailed" + message mentions HTTP
│ │ └── ► See: HTTP Action Workflow below
│ │
│ ├── parent action is Foreach / Apply to each
│ │ └── ► Inspect child actions; handled child failures can still fail the parent
│ │
│ └── Unknown / generic error
│ └── ► Walk actions backwards (Step B below)
@@ -113,6 +116,9 @@ Flow succeeds but output data is wrong
│ ├── Check foreach condition — filter may be too strict
│ └── Check if parallel foreach caused race condition (add Sequential)
├── Filter/Query result unexpectedly matches nulls or returns empty
│ └── Guard lookup keys before the filter; do not compare null-to-null
└── Date/time values wrong timezone
└── Use convertTimeZone() — utcNow() is always UTC
```