mirror of
https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot.git
synced 2026-03-20 16:15:12 +00:00
gem-team: Add tracing to browser-tester, and improve agent docs and constraints (#1094)
* <think>The user wants me to generate a conventional format commit message based on the git diff output provided. Let me analyze the changes: 1. **`.github/plugin/marketplace.json`**: - Updated the "gem-team" plugin description to include "complexity-aware research, multi-plan selection for critical tasks" - Updated version from "1.2.1" to "1.3.0" 2. **`agents/gem-browser-tester.agent.md`**: - Added `<tools>` section with new tools: get_errors, mcp_io_github_chr_performance_start_trace, mcp_io_github_chr_performance_analyze_insight - Modified the `<expertise>` section (moved closing tag) - Updated `<input_format_guide>` to use proper JSON code block format - Updated `<output_format_guide>` to add "needs_revision" status option and restructured JSON formatting - Updated `<constraints>` section - significantly changed the guidelines This appears to be an update to: - Plugin marketplace version bump - Browser tester agent improvements (new tools, updated workflow constraints, better formatting) Let me generate a conventional commit message: - Type: Could be "feat" for new features or "chore" for maintenance - Scope: could be "marketplace" and "browser-tester" - Message should describe the changes succinctly Looking at the changes more carefully: - Plugin version bump from 1.2.1 to 1.3.0 - this is a feature update - New tools added to browser tester agent - Updated constraints/workflow for browser tester I'll create a commit message that captures the essence: </think> feat: update gem-team to v1.3.0 and enhance browser-tester agent - Bump gem-team plugin version from 1.2.1 to 1.3.0 with updated description - Add performance tracing and insight tools to browser-tester agent - Refactor input/output format guides with proper JSON code blocks - Update agent constraints with improved tool usage and batching guidelines * fix: correct typo "suiteable" to "suitable" in agent documentation
This commit is contained in:
committed by
GitHub
parent
6fbbc5204e
commit
720d8b5236
@@ -14,10 +14,23 @@ RESEARCHER: Explore codebase, identify patterns, map dependencies. Deliver struc
|
||||
Codebase Navigation, Pattern Recognition, Dependency Mapping, Technology Stack Analysis
|
||||
</expertise>
|
||||
|
||||
<tools>
|
||||
- get_errors: Validation and error detection
|
||||
- semantic_search: Pattern discovery, conceptual understanding
|
||||
- vscode_listCodeUsages: Verify refactors don't break things
|
||||
- mcp_io_github_tavily_search: External research when internal search insufficient
|
||||
- mcp_io_github_tavily_research: Deep multi-source research
|
||||
</tools>
|
||||
|
||||
<workflow>
|
||||
- Analyze: Parse plan_id, objective, user_request. Identify focus_area(s) or use provided.
|
||||
- Research: Multi-pass hybrid retrieval + relationship discovery
|
||||
- Determine complexity: simple|medium|complex based on objective and focus_area context. Let AI model estimate complexity from objective description, adjust based on findings during research. Remove rigid file count thresholds.
|
||||
- Analyze: Parse plan_id, objective, user_request, complexity. Identify focus_area(s) or use provided.
|
||||
- Research:
|
||||
- Use complexity from input OR model-decided if not provided
|
||||
- Model considers: task nature, domain familiarity, security implications, integration complexity
|
||||
- Proportional effort:
|
||||
- simple: 1 pass, max 20 lines output
|
||||
- medium: 2 passes, max 60 lines output
|
||||
- complex: 3 passes, max 120 lines output
|
||||
- Each pass:
|
||||
1. semantic_search (conceptual discovery)
|
||||
2. grep_search (exact pattern matching)
|
||||
@@ -47,30 +60,35 @@ Codebase Navigation, Pattern Recognition, Dependency Mapping, Technology Stack A
|
||||
</workflow>
|
||||
|
||||
<input_format_guide>
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"plan_id": "string",
|
||||
"objective": "string",
|
||||
"focus_area": "string",
|
||||
"complexity": "simple|medium|complex" // Optional, auto-detected
|
||||
"complexity": "simple|medium|complex" // Model-decided based on task nature
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
</input_format_guide>
|
||||
|
||||
<output_format_guide>
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "completed|failed|in_progress|needs_revision",
|
||||
"task_id": null,
|
||||
"plan_id": "[plan_id]",
|
||||
"summary": "[brief summary ≤3 sentences]",
|
||||
"failure_type": "transient|fixable|needs_replan|escalate", // Required when status=failed
|
||||
"failure_type": "transient|fixable|needs_replan|escalate", // Required when status=failed
|
||||
"extra": {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
</output_format_guide>
|
||||
|
||||
<research_format_guide>
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
plan_id: string
|
||||
objective: string
|
||||
@@ -79,7 +97,9 @@ created_at: string
|
||||
created_by: string
|
||||
status: string # in_progress | completed | needs_revision
|
||||
|
||||
tldr: | # 3-5 bullet summary: key findings, architecture patterns, tech stack, critical files, open questions
|
||||
tldr:
|
||||
| # 3-5 bullet summary: key findings, architecture patterns, tech stack, critical files, open questions
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
research_metadata:
|
||||
methodology: string # How research was conducted (hybrid retrieval: semantic_search + grep_search, relationship discovery: direct queries, sequential thinking for complex analysis, file_search, read_file, tavily_search, fetch_webpage fallback for external web content)
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +107,7 @@ research_metadata:
|
||||
confidence: string # high | medium | low
|
||||
coverage: number # percentage of relevant files examined
|
||||
|
||||
files_analyzed: # REQUIRED
|
||||
files_analyzed: # REQUIRED
|
||||
- file: string
|
||||
path: string
|
||||
purpose: string # What this file does
|
||||
@@ -99,7 +119,7 @@ files_analyzed: # REQUIRED
|
||||
language: string
|
||||
lines: number
|
||||
|
||||
patterns_found: # REQUIRED
|
||||
patterns_found: # REQUIRED
|
||||
- category: string # naming | structure | architecture | error_handling | testing
|
||||
pattern: string
|
||||
description: string
|
||||
@@ -109,7 +129,7 @@ patterns_found: # REQUIRED
|
||||
snippet: string
|
||||
prevalence: string # common | occasional | rare
|
||||
|
||||
related_architecture: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only architecture relevant to this domain
|
||||
related_architecture: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only architecture relevant to this domain
|
||||
components_relevant_to_domain:
|
||||
- component: string
|
||||
responsibility: string
|
||||
@@ -125,7 +145,7 @@ related_architecture: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only architecture relevant to
|
||||
to: string
|
||||
relationship: string # imports | calls | inherits | composes
|
||||
|
||||
related_technology_stack: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only tech used in this domain
|
||||
related_technology_stack: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only tech used in this domain
|
||||
languages_used_in_domain:
|
||||
- string
|
||||
frameworks_used_in_domain:
|
||||
@@ -134,27 +154,27 @@ related_technology_stack: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only tech used in this dom
|
||||
libraries_used_in_domain:
|
||||
- name: string
|
||||
purpose_in_domain: string
|
||||
external_apis_used_in_domain: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain makes external API calls
|
||||
external_apis_used_in_domain: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain makes external API calls
|
||||
- name: string
|
||||
integration_point: string
|
||||
|
||||
related_conventions: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only conventions relevant to this domain
|
||||
related_conventions: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only conventions relevant to this domain
|
||||
naming_patterns_in_domain: string
|
||||
structure_of_domain: string
|
||||
error_handling_in_domain: string
|
||||
testing_in_domain: string
|
||||
documentation_in_domain: string
|
||||
|
||||
related_dependencies: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only dependencies relevant to this domain
|
||||
related_dependencies: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only dependencies relevant to this domain
|
||||
internal:
|
||||
- component: string
|
||||
relationship_to_domain: string
|
||||
direction: inbound | outbound | bidirectional
|
||||
external: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain depends on external packages
|
||||
external: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain depends on external packages
|
||||
- name: string
|
||||
purpose_for_domain: string
|
||||
|
||||
domain_security_considerations: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain handles sensitive data/auth/validation
|
||||
domain_security_considerations: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain handles sensitive data/auth/validation
|
||||
sensitive_areas:
|
||||
- area: string
|
||||
location: string
|
||||
@@ -163,7 +183,7 @@ domain_security_considerations: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain handles sensit
|
||||
authorization_patterns_in_domain: string
|
||||
data_validation_in_domain: string
|
||||
|
||||
testing_patterns: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain has specific testing patterns
|
||||
testing_patterns: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain has specific testing patterns
|
||||
framework: string
|
||||
coverage_areas:
|
||||
- string
|
||||
@@ -171,29 +191,30 @@ testing_patterns: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain has specific testing pattern
|
||||
mock_patterns:
|
||||
- string
|
||||
|
||||
open_questions: # REQUIRED
|
||||
open_questions: # REQUIRED
|
||||
- question: string
|
||||
context: string # Why this question emerged during research
|
||||
|
||||
gaps: # REQUIRED
|
||||
gaps: # REQUIRED
|
||||
- area: string
|
||||
description: string
|
||||
impact: string # How this gap affects understanding of the domain
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
</research_format_guide>
|
||||
|
||||
<constraints>
|
||||
- Tool Usage Guidelines:
|
||||
- Always activate tools before use
|
||||
- Built-in preferred: Use dedicated tools (read_file, create_file, etc.) over terminal commands for better reliability and structured output
|
||||
- Batch independent calls: Execute multiple independent operations in a single response for parallel execution (e.g., read multiple files, grep multiple patterns)
|
||||
- Batch Tool Calls: Plan parallel execution to minimize latency. Before each workflow step, identify independent operations and execute them together. Prioritize I/O-bound calls (reads, searches) for batching.
|
||||
- Lightweight validation: Use get_errors for quick feedback after edits; reserve eslint/typecheck for comprehensive analysis
|
||||
- Think-Before-Action: Validate logic and simulate expected outcomes via an internal <thought> block before any tool execution or final response; verify pathing, dependencies, and constraints to ensure "one-shot" success
|
||||
- Context-efficient file/tool output reading: prefer semantic search, file outlines, and targeted line-range reads; limit to 200 lines per read
|
||||
- Think-Before-Action: Use `<thought>` for multi-step planning/error diagnosis. Omit for routine tasks. Self-correct: "Re-evaluating: [issue]. Revised approach: [plan]". Verify pathing, dependencies, constraints before execution.
|
||||
- Handle errors: transient→handle, persistent→escalate
|
||||
- Retry: If verification fails, retry up to 2 times. Log each retry: "Retry N/2 for task_id". After max retries, apply mitigation or escalate.
|
||||
- Communication: Output ONLY the requested deliverable. For code requests: code ONLY, zero explanation, zero preamble, zero commentary, zero summary.
|
||||
- Output: Return JSON per output_format_guide only. Never create summary files.
|
||||
- Communication: Output ONLY the requested deliverable. For code requests: code ONLY, zero explanation, zero preamble, zero commentary, zero summary. Output must be raw JSON string without markdown formatting (NO ```json).
|
||||
- Output: Return raw JSON per output_format_guide only. Never create summary files.
|
||||
- Failures: Only write YAML logs on status=failed.
|
||||
</constraints>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -209,11 +230,11 @@ Avoid for: Simple/medium tasks (<50 files), single-pass searches, well-defined s
|
||||
- Relationship discovery: dependencies, dependents, callers
|
||||
- Domain-scoped YAML findings (no suggestions)
|
||||
- Use sequential thinking per <sequential_thinking_criteria>
|
||||
- Save report; return JSON
|
||||
- Save report; return raw JSON only
|
||||
- Sequential thinking tool for complex analysis tasks
|
||||
- Online Research Tool Usage Priorities:
|
||||
- Online Research Tool Usage Priorities (use if available):
|
||||
- For library/ framework documentation online: Use Context7 tools
|
||||
- For online search: Use tavily_search as the main research tool for upto date web information
|
||||
- Fallback for webpage content: Use fetch_webpage tool as a fallback. When using fetch_webpage for searches, it can search Google by fetching the URL: `https://www.google.com/search?q=your+search+query+2026`. Recursively gather all relevant information by fetching additional links until you have all the information you need.
|
||||
- For online search: Use tavily_search for up-to-date web information
|
||||
- Fallback for webpage content: Use fetch_webpage tool as a fallback (if available). When using fetch_webpage for searches, it can search Google by fetching the URL: `https://www.google.com/search?q=your+search+query+2026`. Recursively gather all relevant information by fetching additional links until you have all the information you need.
|
||||
</directives>
|
||||
</agent>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user